Back to Work After Bariatric Surgery? A Belgian Population Study.

INTRODUCTION: Aside from an impact on health, obesity is also associated with higher social and economic costs such as impaired productivity, increased work absenteeism, and higher rates of unemployment. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of bariatric surgery on employment status in a large nationwide database, using data from all patients that underwent bariatric surgery in Belgium. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all Belgian patients that underwent bariatric surgery between 2014 and 2015. The work status of these patients was examined yearly: 4 years before and 3 years after surgery. Increased employment after surgery was defined (1) as a reduction in days of unemployment and incapacity and (2) as the resumption of work among the unemployed. RESULTS: In total, 16,276 patients were included. The number of working people rose from 49.7% before to 61.2% 3 years after bariatric surgery, i.e., an increase of 11.5% between pre- and post-surgery. The largest improvement in reduction in unemployment was found in individuals who were absent from work for more than 9 months, namely, a reduction from 13.4 to 7.2%. In the population of unemployed patients, 20.9% became employed after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION: We found an increase in employment rate and a decrease in work incapacity and unemployment after bariatric surgery. Higher rates of employment after bariatric surgery may also contribute to an increased cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery. It would be interesting to research possible targeting strategies to increase the employment rate even more after bariatric surgery.

Attendance at cervical cancer screening and use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures on the uterine cervix assessed from individual health insurance data (Belgium, 2002-2006).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the coverage for cervical cancer screening as well as the use of cervical cytology, colposcopy and other diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on the uterine cervix in Belgium, using individual health insurance data. METHODS: The Intermutualistic Agency compiled a database containing 14 million records from reimbursement claims for Pap smears, colposcopies, cervical biopsies and surgery, performed between 2002 and 2006. Cervical cancer screening coverage was defined as the proportion of women aged 25-64 that had a Pap smear within the last 3 years. RESULTS: Cervical cancer screening coverage was 61% at national level, for the target population of women between 25 and 64 years old, in the period 2004-2006. Differences between the 3 regions were small, but varied more substantially between provinces. Coverage was 70% for 25-34 year old women, 67% for those aged 35-39 years, and decreased to 44% in the age group of 60-64 years. The median screening interval was 13 months. The screening coverage varied substantially by social category: 40% and 64%, in women categorised as beneficiary or not-beneficiary of increased reimbursement from social insurance, respectively. In the 3-year period 2004-2006, 3.2 million screen tests were done in the target group consisting of 2.8 million women. However, only 1.7 million women got one or more smears and 1.1 million women had no smears, corresponding to an average of 1.88 smears per woman in three years of time. Colposcopy was excessively used (number of Pap smears over colposcopies = 3.2). The proportion of women with a history of conisation or hysterectomy, before the age of 65, was 7% and 19%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The screening coverage increased slightly from 59% in 2000 to 61% in 2006. The screening intensity remained at a high level, and the number of cytological examinations was theoretically sufficient to cover more than the whole target population.

Analysis of 13 million individual patient records pertaining to Pap smears, colposcopies, biopsies and surgery on the uterine cervix (Belgium, 1996-2000).

OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer screening by surveys overestimate coverage because of selection and reporting biases. METHODS: The prepared Inter-Mutualistic Agency dataset has about 13 million records from Pap smears, colposcopies, cervical biopsies and surgery, performed in Belgium between 1996 and 2000. Cervical cancer screening coverage was defined as the proportion of the target population (women of 25-64 years) that has had a Pap smear taken within the last 3 years. Proportions and incidence rates were computed using official population data of the corresponding age group, area and calendar year. RESULTS: Cervical cancer screening coverage, in the period 1998-2000, was 59% at national level, for the target age group 25-64 years. Differences were small between the 3 regions. Variation ranged from 39% to 71%. Coverage was 64% for 25-29 year old women, 67% for those aged 30-39 years, 56% for those aged 50-54. The modal screening interval was 1 year. In the 3-year period 1998-2000, 3 million smears were taken from the 2.7 million women in the age group 25-64. Only 1.6 million women of the target group got one or more smears in that period and 1.1 million women had no smears, corresponding to an average of 1.88 smears per woman. CONCLUSION: Coverage reached only 59%, but the number of smears used was sufficient to cover more than 100% of the target population. Structural reduction of overuse and extension of coverage is warranted.

Low incidence of anti-osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture.

BACKGROUND: Following hip fracture, pharmacologic treatment can reduce the rate of subsequent fragility fractures. The objective of the present study was to assess the proportion of patients who are managed with bisphosphonates or selective estrogen-receptor modulators after hip fracture and to evaluate, among those managed with alendronate, the twelve-month compliance and persistence with treatment. METHODS: Data were gathered from health insurance companies and were collected by AIM (Agence Intermutualiste) for the Belgian National Social Security Institute (INAMI). We selected all postmenopausal women who had been hospitalized for a hip fracture between April 2001 and June 2004 and had not been previously managed with bisphosphonates. Patients who had received alendronate treatment after the hip fracture were categorized according to their formulation use during the follow-up study (daily, weekly, daily followed by weekly, or weekly followed by weekly). Compliance at twelve months was quantified with use of the medication possession ratio (i.e., the number of days of alendronate supplied during the first year of treatment, divided by 365). Persistence with prescribed treatment was calculated as the number of days from the initial prescription to a lapse of more than five weeks after completion of the previous prescription refill. The cumulative treatment persistence rate was determined with use of Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: A total of 23,146 patients who had sustained a hip fracture were identified. Of these patients, 6% received treatment during the study period: 4.6% received alendronate, 0.7% received risedronate, and 0.7% received raloxifene. Bisphosphonate treatment was dispensed to 2.6% and 3.6% of the patients within six months and one year after the occurrence of the hip fracture, respectively. Among women who received alendronate daily (n = 124) or weekly (n = 182) and were followed for at least one year after the hip fracture, the twelve-month mean medication possession ratio was 67% (65.9% in the daily group and 67.7% in the weekly group). The analysis of persistence with treatment included a total of 726 patients (142 in the daily group, 261 in the weekly group, and 323 in the switch group). At twelve months, the rate of persistence was 41% and the median duration of persistence was 40.3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients who experience a hip fracture do not take anti-osteoporotic therapy after the fracture. Furthermore, among patients who begin alendronate treatment after the fracture, the adherence to treatment decreases over time and remains suboptimal.